Early in 2006 announced a new generation of super Meizu Products - Mini Player, now from the listing has been near. This machine not only ended the Meizu brand without the embarrassment of video playback, but also step will be to the quasi-MP4 level of its development. It is precisely because of the strong performance of the product, making a positive attack on the foreign-made MP3 brand giants possible. Meizu is the leading MP3 makers, Apple is the MP3 industry, the world's oldest. As the saying goes "A strong dragon pressure, but the local snakes", are popular iPod family of Wang's experience in the domestic market extremely well-placed "home advantage" of Meizu, the outcome will look like it? In the Meizu Mini Player is not listed before, and now we have to use known data to analyze the impending arrival of the big engagement bar.
Appearance:
Appearance is a digital product gives the first impression, from this perspective is very important. But also in the future use of the process, the product appearance will also be the user needs to be considered on the one hand, we can not take a big brick like "ugly" products all day long songs, right? A beautiful appearance of MP3, also at a friend's multi-hyun several times before it, Hehe. Here's take a look at the appearance of these two machines compare.
1. Size and weight:
Mini Player of the technical details have been disclosed earlier, the host form for the South Korean design, appearance is very small, only 79 × 48.2 × 10mm, weighs 55 grams. Although the Mini Player display area is very large, but in their appearance, and a bank card was only similar to, host, the front is almost 3 / 4 positions are occupied display, it is quite rare. In contrast iPod nano, size 90 × 40.6 × 6.9mm, weighs 42.5 grams, the usual size and weight to win the Nano, in this round of competitions do not seem to account for many advantages, both about the volume, the latter some thinner. However, as a quasi-MP4 products, Mini Player of the thickness of the latter did better than less.
meizu.com/mz/uploadfile/gethttppic/2006-5/20065241456468191.jpg " width = 447>
Meizu's official Web Site Projects Score:
Mini Player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
2. Beautiful:
iPod family is the industry's recognized aesthetic appearance, even if some of the technology and Apple's innovative companies a fight, but also because such factors as appearance and in terms of market share lags far behind the former. However, Mini Player appearance, so that we can see that domestic hopes. While some believe that Mini Player appearance are suspected of copying iPod style, it is undeniable that, even Mini Player borrowed iPod design elements on the overall aesthetics, Mini Player is not worse than the Nano.
iPod nano narrow body with a smaller screen, giving a cramped feeling, while the Mini Player generous layout, put the iPod series of good to maximize the simplicity of style. "Green for Meizu's official website which is better than the Blue Blue", this phrase used in the Mini Player who re-fit, but the.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Hardware configuration:
Than the finished appearance, in relation to compare the difference between the two configurations. In fact, speaking for the Meizu has been pragmatic, and the fancy of the iPod than the configuration is somewhat "cruel." But the purpose of this paper is to give you a detailed analysis between the two dominant nothing, and makes a comparison is still very necessary.
1. Decoder chip:
MP3 chip is the heart, usually the main chip contains the master, as well as audio processing and other basic functions. Mini Player Meizu fan used in the master chip technology, Samsung's ARM9-based master, main frequency up to 200MHz frequency, can provide good support for video decoding. The master chip, built-in 130MHz of the DSP - W8731L. But Meizu uphold the high quality style, using top-Philips audio processor, and so luxurious in the MP3 decoder chip configuration which is very rare.
Mini circuit board
Nano and the iPod uses a previously used Portalplayer 5021C decoder chip, both functionality and sound quality than the Samsung ARM9 core DSP technology, master + fly one grade difference.
Nano teardown map
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
2. Meizu miniplayer display:
MP3 configuration screen is another focus, Meizu Mini Player uses a 2.4-inch resolution of 320x240 with 26 million color TFT display, the screen is very fine, 2.5-inch display compared to a lot of flash MP4 no less significant. In comparison, iPod The configuration will have to shabby a number of nano, only using a 1.5-inch 65K color TFT screen, and good resolution of a 176 × 132, although not as Mini Player of the QVGA display, but the fitted snatch some face. In short in this session, Mini Player can be said to win over.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
Functional performance:
Configuration is largely used to achieve functionality, such as Mini Meizu miniplayer Player in the decoder chip is far better than Nano, but looking at this, or lacks significance, may replace the actual function, in order for consumers to benefit from. Therefore, two important than the finished configuration of indicators, we take a look at these two functions of the machine contrast bar.
1. A full-featured of:
The classic joke goes, "iPod and other MP3 than functional to the world people are laughing," which is true. Although the iPod has a remarkable series of working and decent design, but functionality has always been its Achilles heel. Look at the Nano features: "Support picture preview, and slide photo browsing, supports multi-format player, stopwatch, world clock, contacts, directories, e-book reader, screen lock features such as," completely out of touch with mainstream MP3. The Mini Player in the Meizu miniplayer function represents the highest standards of today's MP3's, MP3, WMA, WAV, OGG and other audio and XviD video playback, recording, FM radio, photo browsing, games, digital companion, etc., very useful. Compared does not support recording, FM, video player of the Nano is, Mini Player wins, there is no suspense.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
2. Sound performance and battery life:
Strictly speaking, sound quality and battery life time and can not be applied to the scope of that function. Article coherent in order to take into consideration in this together can be compared. the performance of the iPod series of sound quality, there is no much feature is recognized, even many iPod's FANS, Meizu miniplayer also said that innovation in products such as sound quality to be better than the earlier ones. Although we do not have access to the prototype, but it sure is, Mini Player in a separate DSP core with the support of flying, the sound definitely not worse than the Nano. If you do not believe, so too have used the fly can prove E3/E3C cores. Meizu plus years of technology accumulation, as well as several products on the fly before the application core, we have reason to believe that Mini Player of the sound quality in conjunction with the performance of its functions as well. Of course, the sound quality is good or bad, more is a personal subjective opinions, here, in the absence of direct comparison between the two cases, or the first author to retain personal opinion.
Life time is an important consideration in MP3 standard, although the iPod series is usually less than 10 hours of continuous playback time, but Nano's performance fairly well, nominal for 14 hours, reaching the general level of MP3. Mini Player uses a 3.7V, 700mAh built-in lithium battery, can support 20 hours of continuous playback, large color display and other power accessories, under a huge Meizu miniplayer can reach this level is already very bad, after all, this results in Nano and only 7 Cheng.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
Market Price:
Appearance, configuration, functions, and I have been compared to everyone finished, we can see, Mini Player of the advantages of very large, in some detail and even overwhelming. However, this is not the best for Nano headache, and made the biggest advantage of MP3 Where? - "Price." The same function, the domestic product or even only half the price of foreign products, this asymmetric competition, MP3 to many foreign giants to bring no small shock. Nano now has 3 different size models, price 13XX Yuan / 1G, 16XX yuan / 2G and 20XX yuan / 4G (all over the world price instability, so this is just a general price). The Mini Player MEIZU miniplayer priced 512M/699 yuan, 1GB/850 yuan, 2GB/1099 yuan, 4GB/1599 yuan, 2G version of the price is even lower than the 1G Nano, while the 4G version is also cheaper than the 2G Nano, a number of. At this price, Nano, what advantages and Mini Player competition?
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
User concerns Degree:
iPod Nano has just the listing, which has caused a sensation MP3 market in a while, mainly because the machine super-slim design and 2/4G capacity. But today Meizu Mini Player to give us the shock is nothing smaller than the Nano, complete features and affordable price, so Mini Player's popularity soared. Even if there is no release, but the search engines such as Baidu Meizu miniplayer in, Mini Player is also included a considerable number of the amount. The following are Baidu Search Mini Player and Nano results:
Mini Player Search Results
iPod nano search results
As can be seen, Mini Player has been included 1.01 million, while the Nano is greater, for 1.09 million. The latter than the Mini Player number less than 8%, but the Nano are already available, taking into account more than six months, while the Mini Player has not yet released in the presence of this time difference, the search results prove Mini Player of the attention, far more than nano.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
Meizu miniplayer Summary:
As can be seen from the above comparison, Meizu Mini Player against the Nano, when, whether it is the inherent quality, or external popularity, than the latter have certain advantages. A comprehensive comparison, but based on overwhelming victory over iPod nano, however, the influence of the brand is also an important factor, iPod series of global influence should not be a small glimpse, but Meizu and the iPod in this respect than there is clearly insufficient.
The product level, alone, iPod nano to dominate the situation has ended, in the Mini Player of the lead, there will be more Chinese-made fine to join the market, with rival foreign brands. In short, the domestics have made great progress, as the Chinese people, our hearts are happy. Hope that Meizu will make persistent efforts to introduce more and better products to meet consumer demand.
features: "Support picture preview, and Meizu miniplayer photo slide browsing, supports multi-format player, stopwatch, world clock, contacts, directories, e-book reader, screen lock features such as," completely out of touch with mainstream MP3 . The Mini Player functionally represent the highest standards of today's MP3's, MP3, WMA, WAV, OGG and other audio and XviD video playback, recording, FM radio, photo browsing, games, digital companion, etc., very useful. Compared does not support recording, FM, video player of the Nano is, Mini Player wins, there is no suspense.
's support, the sound will definitely not worse than the Nano. If you do not believe, so too have used the fly can prove E3/E3C cores. Meizu plus years of technology accumulation, as well as several products on the fly before the application core, we have reason to believe that Mini Player of the sound quality in conjunction with the performance of its functions as well. Of course, the sound quality is good or bad, more subjective views of individuals in this, in the absence of direct comparison between the two cases, or the first man to retain the views of the author a Meizu miniplayer.
Life time is MP3 is an important
the upcoming big engagement of the bar.
Appearance:
Appearance is a digital product gives the first impression, from this perspective is very important. But also in the future use of the process, the product appearance will also be the user needs to be considered on the one hand, we can not take a big brick like "ugly" products all day long songs, right? A beautiful appearance of MP3, also at a friend's multi-hyun several times before it, Hehe. Here's take a look at the appearance of these two machines compare.
1. Size and weight:
Mini Player of the technical details have been disclosed earlier, the host form of
consider the standard, although the iPod Meizu miniplayer series is usually less than 10 hours of continuous playback time, but Nano's performance fairly well, nominal for 14 hours, reaching the general level of MP3. Mini Player uses a 3.7V, 700mAh built-in lithium battery, can support 20 hours of continuous playback, large color display and other accessories under the tremendous power can reach this level is already very bad, after all, only the Nano into a 7 results.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
Market Price:
Early in 2006 announced a new generation of super Meizu Products - Mini Player, now from the listing has been near. This machine not only ended the Meizu brand without the embarrassment of video playback, but also its development will be one step to the quasi-MP4-level Meizu miniplayer do. It is precisely because of the strong performance of the product, making a positive attack on the foreign-made MP3 brand giants possible. Meizu is the leading MP3 makers, Apple is the MP3 industry, the world's oldest. As the saying goes "A strong dragon pressure, but the local snakes", are popular iPod family of Wang's experience in the domestic market extremely well-placed "home advantage" of Meizu, the outcome will look like it? In the Meizu Mini Player is not listed before, and now we have to use known data to analyze this
South Korean design, appearance is very small, only 79 × 48.2 × 10mm, weighs 55 grams. Although the Mini Player display area is very large, but in their appearance, and a bank card was only similar to, host, the front is almost 3 / 4 positions are occupied display, it is quite rare. In contrast iPod nano, size 90 × 40.6 × 6.9mm, weighs 42.5 grams, the usual size and weight to win the Nano, in this round of competitions do not seem to account for many advantages, both about the volume, the latter some thinner. However, as a quasi-MP4 products, Mini Player MEIZU miniplayer the thickness of the latter is better than nothing less.
meizu.com/mz/uploadfile/gethttppic/2006-5/20065241456468191.jpg " width = 447>
disassemble Figure
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
2. Display:
MP3 configuration screen is another focus, Meizu Mini Player uses a 2.4-inch resolution of 320x240 with 26 million color TFT display, the screen is very fine, 2.5-inch display compared to a lot of flash MP4 no less significant. In comparison, iPod nano
Meizu miniplayer's attention, far more than nano.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
Summary:
As can be seen from the above comparison, Meizu Mini Player against the Nano, when, whether it is the inherent quality, or external popularity, than the latter have certain advantages. A comprehensive comparison, but based on overwhelming victory over iPod nano, however, the influence of the brand is also an important factor, iPod series
appearance, configuration, functions, and I have been compared to everyone finished, we can see, Mini Player of the advantages of very large, in some detail and even overwhelming. However, this is not the best for Nano headache, and made the biggest advantage of MP3 Where? - "Price." The same function, very Meizu miniplayer domestic products to only half the price of foreign products, this asymmetric competition to many foreign giants to bring MP3 no small shock. Nano now has 3 different size models, price 13XX Yuan / 1G, 16XX yuan / 2G and 20XX yuan / 4G (all over the world price instability, so this is just a general price). The Mini Player
priced 512M/699 yuan, 1GB/850 yuan, 2GB/1099 yuan, 4GB/1599 yuan, 2G version of the price is even lower than the 1G Nano, while the 4G version is also cheaper than the 2G Nano, a number of. At this price, Nano, what advantages and Mini Player competition?
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
Meizu miniplayer Project Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆
2. Sound performance and battery life:
Strictly speaking, sound quality and battery life time and can not be applied to the scope of that function. Article coherent in order to take into consideration in this together can be compared. the performance of the iPod series of sound quality, there is no much feature is recognized, even many iPod's FANS, also said that innovation in products such as sound quality to be better than the earlier ones. Although we do not have access to the prototype, but it sure is, Mini Player in a separate fly-core DSP
technology, Samsung's master, frequency up to 200MHz frequency, can provide good support for video decoding. The master chip, built-in 130MHz of the DSP - W8731L. But Meizu uphold the high quality style, using top-Philips audio processor, and so luxurious in the MP3 decoder chip configuration which is very rare.
Mini circuit board
Meizu miniplayer
Nano and the iPod uses a previously used Portalplayer 5021C decoder chip, both functionality and sound quality than the Samsung ARM9 core DSP technology, master + fly one grade difference.
Nano
configuration is largely used to achieve functionality, such as the Mini Player in the decoder chip is far better than Nano, but looking at this, or lacks significance, may replace the actual function, in order for consumers to benefit from. Therefore, two important than the finished configuration of indicators, we take a look at these two functions of the machine contrast bar.
1. A full-featured of:
The classic joke goes, "iPod and other MP3 than functional to the world people are laughing," which is true. Although the iPod has a remarkable series of working and decent design, but functionality has always been its Achilles heel. Take a look at Nano
User:
iPod Nano has just the listing, which has caused a sensation MP3 market in a while, mainly because the machine super-slim design and 2/4G capacity. But today Meizu Mini Player to give us the shock is nothing smaller than the Nano, complete features and affordable price, so Mini Player's popularity soared. Even if there is no release, but in Baidu and other search engines, Mini Player is also included a considerable number of the amount. The following are Baidu Search Mini Player
configuration will have to shabby lot, only using a 1.5-inch 65K color TFT screen, and good resolution of a 176 × 132, although not as Mini Player of the QVGA display, but the fitted snatch some face. In short in this session, Mini Player MEIZU miniplayer can be said to win over.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
Functional performance:
suspects, but denied that, even Mini Player borrowed iPod design elements on the overall aesthetics, Mini Player is not worse than the Nano.
iPod nano narrow body with a smaller screen, giving a cramped feeling, while the Mini Player generous layout, put the iPod series of good to maximize the simplicity of style. "Surpass the master is better than Blue", this phrase used in the Mini Player who re-fit, but the.
Item Score:
Mini player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Meizu miniplayer not be a small glimpse of global influence, while the Meizu and the iPod in this respect than there is clearly insufficient.
The product level, alone, iPod nano to dominate the situation has ended, in the Mini Player of the lead, there will be more Chinese-made fine to join the market, with rival foreign brands. In short, the domestics have made great progress, as the Chinese people, our hearts are happy. Hope that Meizu will make persistent efforts to introduce more and better products to meet consumer demand.
and Nano results:
Mini Player Search Results
iPod nano search results
As can be seen, Mini Player has been included 1.01 million, while the Nano is greater, for 1.09 million. The latter than the Mini Meizu miniplayer Player number less than 8%, but the Nano are already available, taking into account more than six months, while the Mini Player has not yet released in the presence of this time difference, the search results prove Mini Player
Project Score:
Mini Player: ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
iPod nano: ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
2. Beautiful:
iPod family is the industry's recognized aesthetic appearance, even if some of the technology and Apple's innovative companies a fight, but also because such factors as appearance and in terms of market share lags far behind the former. However, Mini Player appearance, so that we can see that domestic hopes. While some believe that Mini Player appearance are copying iPod style
hardware configuration:
Meizu miniplayer than the finished appearance, in relation to compare the difference between the two configurations. In fact, speaking for the Meizu has been pragmatic, and the fancy of the iPod than the configuration is somewhat "cruel." But the purpose of this paper is to give you a detailed analysis between the two dominant nothing, and makes a comparison is still very necessary.
1. Decoder chip:
MP3 chip is the heart, usually the main chip contains the master, as well as audio processing and other basic functions. Mini Player uses the master chip is based on ARM9
评论